Review Article
Tatyana Shoustikova, Zulfiya F. Zaripova, Gasangusein Ibragimov, Natalia A. Zaitseva, Olga V. Pashanova, Alisa V. Lobuteva
CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 18, Issue 1, Article No: ep628
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study is to research based on artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in the context of education with the bibliometric analysis method. Study identifies trends in studies on AI literacy and reveals the main disciplines, methodologies, and thematic focal points of this field. During the data collection process, a comprehensive search of the Web of Science and Scopus databases was carried out. A total of 154 articles published as of February 2025 were included in the analysis. The year of publication, database, research area, country of publication, journal in which it was published, university in which it was conducted, author distribution, method, abstract and keyword trends, and citation network information were analyzed. VOSviewer software was used for data visualization and network mapping. According to the results; It was seen that the first article on the subject was published in 2019 and the highest number of articles were published in 2024. In the researches, it was seen that AI literacy focused on teacher education, student skills, reflection on programs, ethical concerns and technological infrastructure. It was observed that the most phase research was conducted in China and the USA and the quantitative method was predominantly used. The journals in which the researches are published the most are Education and Information Technologies and Computers and education: Artificial Intelligence. As an institution, Education University of Hong Kong is the university with the most research on the subject. It was observed that the words AI, literacy, Higher education and teacher competency were used extensively as keywords and abstracts. In terms of the results, it was suggested to the researchers that comparative studies examining how AI literacy is perceived and applied in different cultural and educational contexts and research that includes multifaceted evaluations in which mixed methodology is put to work can be conducted.
Keywords: artificial intelligence literacy, bibliometric analysis, AI in education, research trends, citation network analysis
Review Article
Muhammad Imran, Norah Almusharraf
CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 15, Issue 4, Article No: ep464
ABSTRACT
This study examines the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant in academia through a systematic literature review of the 30 most relevant articles. Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has become the most debated topic among scholars and is also being used by many users from different fields. Many articles, reviews, blogs, and opinion essays have been published in which the potential role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant is discussed. For this systematic review, 550 articles published six months after ChatGPT’s release (December 2022 to May 2023) were collected based on specific keywords, and the final 30 most relevant articles were finalized through PRISMA flowchart. The analyzed literature identifies different opinions and scenarios associated with using ChatGPT as a writing assistant and how to interact with it. Findings show that artificial intelligence (AI) in education is a part of the ongoing development process, and its latest chatbot, ChatGPT is a part of it. Therefore, the education process, particularly academic writing, has both opportunities and challenges in adopting ChatGPT as a writing assistant. The need is to understand its role as an aid and facilitator for both the learners and instructors, as chatbots are relatively beneficial devices to facilitate, create ease and support the academic process. However, academia should revisit and update students’ and teachers’ training, policies, and assessment ways in writing courses for academic integrity and originality, like plagiarism issues, AI-generated assignments, online/home-based exams, and auto-correction challenges.
Keywords: AI in education, chatbots, ChatGPT as writing assistant, scientific writing, academic integrity